http://blawgcoop.com/badglacier/2005/06/24/boring-alert-emhalbert-v-michiganem/ Whee! Thu, 17 May 2012 12:00:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 http://blawgcoop.com/badglacier/2005/06/24/boring-alert-emhalbert-v-michiganem/#comment-1110 Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:58:17 +0000 http://blawgcoop.com/badglacier/2005/06/24/boring-alert-emhalbert-v-michiganem/#comment-1110 Your professor argued those cases? That's really cool. This was a good case for me to keep track of. It was interesting and wasn't so complex that I lost track of what was going on (though the third-party standing stuff in Kowalski was a little over my head at the time). Your professor argued those cases? That’s really cool. This was a good case for me to keep track of. It was interesting and wasn’t so complex that I lost track of what was going on (though the third-party standing stuff in Kowalski was a little over my head at the time).

]]> http://blawgcoop.com/badglacier/2005/06/24/boring-alert-emhalbert-v-michiganem/#comment-1109 Sun, 26 Jun 2005 22:28:21 +0000 http://blawgcoop.com/badglacier/2005/06/24/boring-alert-emhalbert-v-michiganem/#comment-1109 Random -- my crim professor briefed/argued that case (and the prior one the Supremes dodged on standing), so I followed that case fairly closely too. Good summary! Random — my crim professor briefed/argued that case (and the prior one the Supremes dodged on standing), so I followed that case fairly closely too. Good summary!

]]>